Every practice tracks revenue. Far fewer look hard at the one metric that quietly predicts whether that revenue ever arrives: days in accounts receivable. Days-in-A/R measures the average time between the date you provide a service and the date you actually get paid for it. It is the cash-flow heartbeat of your practice, and when it drifts upward, it does so silently. By the time the number gets your attention, you are often weeks of cash behind where you should be.
The reason practices avoid the number is simple. A high days-in-A/R figure is uncomfortable because it points back at internal habits, not just at stubborn payers. It usually means claims are leaving the building too slowly and being chased too late. The good news is that both of those problems are fixable with workflow changes rather than heroics.
There is no single universal target, but commonly cited industry benchmarks put a healthy practice somewhere in the range of 30 to 40 days in A/R, with high-performing groups pushing under 35. Many practices that finally run the report discover they are sitting at 50, 60, or beyond. A useful companion metric is the percentage of your A/R that is over 90 days old. As a rough guide, many advisors suggest keeping the over-90 bucket under roughly 15 to 20 percent of total A/R. When that aging tail grows, it is a warning that claims are not just slow, they are at real risk of never being collected.
Two numbers worth calculating this week:
If you cannot produce both of these in a few minutes, that difficulty is itself a finding.
Days-in-A/R rarely balloons because of one dramatic failure. It climbs from accumulated friction at two specific points in the cycle.
Slow claim submission. Every day a clean claim sits unsent is a day added directly to A/R. Charges that wait for a weekly batch, encounters that stall because a note is not finalized, claims held for manual scrubbing, secondary claims that only go out once someone remembers to file them. Studies and payer guidance consistently suggest that the longer a claim waits, the higher its denial and timely-filing-rejection risk, which then compounds the delay.
Inconsistent follow-up. A submitted claim is not a paid claim. Unworked claims are where revenue goes to die. Many practices follow up reactively, when a patient calls or a statement bounces, rather than on a defined schedule. Different payers behave differently: some adjudicate in a week, others routinely take three or four. Treating them all the same means you either nag payers who simply have not finished yet or, far worse, let slow payers age quietly past appeal windows.
You do not need a new billing company. You need three operational changes.
The single fastest lever is shrinking the gap between service and submission. That means moving from periodic manual batches to a workflow where a finalized, coded encounter generates a claim automatically and scrubs it against payer edits before it ever leaves. Automated eligibility checks at scheduling and front-desk check-in catch the coverage problems that otherwise surface as denials weeks later. The goal is a "submit within 24-48 hours" standard for clean claims, applied to primary and secondary claims alike.
Replace "follow up when we get around to it" with a rules-based schedule keyed to each payer's typical turnaround. For example:
The point is not the exact days; it is that no claim ages without a scheduled touch, and no appeal window passes unnoticed. Denials should route to a worklist the moment they post, prioritized by dollar value and deadline.
A metric reviewed monthly is a metric that surprises you. Days-in-A/R, aging buckets, denial rate, and clean-claim rate should live on a dashboard refreshed continuously, segmented by payer and by provider. When the over-90 bucket starts growing, you want to know within days, not at the next quarterly meeting. Visibility is what turns A/R management from firefighting into prevention.
This is precisely the workflow GenMed Clinical was built to close. Because charting, scheduling, and billing live on one HIPAA-ready platform, there is no gap to fall through between a finalized note and a submitted claim.
Pull the report. If the figure is higher than you would like, automated submission, disciplined follow-up, and a dashboard you check often will bring it down faster than you expect. GenMed Clinical gives you all three in one place.
Home · Blog · Pricing · Support · Privacy